Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online:7436
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 90-94

Exophthalmometric value and palpebral fissure dimension in an African population


1 Department of Ophthalmology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Oyo State, Nigeria
2 Department of Family Medicine, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
3 Department of Ophthalmology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Date of Web Publication13-Nov-2014

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Waheed A Ibraheem
Department of Ophthalmology, Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Oyo state
Nigeria
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2384-5589.144569

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Normative data for exophthalmometric values and palpebral fissure dimensions are important for earlier diagnosis of orbital and palpebral fissure pathologies. Objective: To describe the normal exophthalmometric values and palpebral fissure dimensions among healthy adults of Black race. Design: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Setting: Population based (general community). Method: Population-based multistage random sampling was used to recruit 1020 subjects who had no orbital or eye lid diseases and were free from systemic disease like thyroid eye disease that may affect orbital volume. These healthy adult subjects had their exophthalmometric values and palpebral fissure dimensions (horizontal and vertical palpebral fissure, lateral and medial canthal distances, inter-outer canthal distance, inter-inner canthal distance, margin reflex distance, and lid crease) measured with a Hertel's exophthalmometer and a plain non-stretchable plastic ruler, respectively. Results: A total of 1020 subjects (515 females and 505 males) of age range 16-85 years were studied. The mean ± SD exophthalmometric values were 15.27 ± 2.5 and 15.31 ± 2.4 mm for the right and left eyes, respectively. In the right eye, the mean palpebral fissure height was 8.3 mm, mean palpebral fissure width was 32.1 mm, mean upper eyelid crease was 7.1 mm, mean margin reflex height was 3.2 mm, mean lateral canthal distance was 12.9 mm, and the mean medial canthal distance was 10 mm at primary position of gaze. Conclusions: Exophthalmometric values and palpebral fissure dimensions were obtained among healthy adult Nigerians. Knowledge of these normal parameters is valuable in the management of eyelids and orbital diseases, as well as in manufacturing spectacles.

Keywords: Exophthalmometry, palpebral dimensions, Hertel′s exophthalmometer


How to cite this article:
Ibraheem WA, Ibraheem AB, Bekibele CO. Exophthalmometric value and palpebral fissure dimension in an African population. Afr J Med Health Sci 2014;13:90-4

How to cite this URL:
Ibraheem WA, Ibraheem AB, Bekibele CO. Exophthalmometric value and palpebral fissure dimension in an African population. Afr J Med Health Sci [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Mar 26];13:90-4. Available from: http://www.ajmhs.org/text.asp?2014/13/2/90/144569


  Introduction Top


Exophthalmometry is the quantitative assessment of the position of the globe in the orbit. [1] It may be defined as the measurement of the distance between two parallel planes, one tangential to the apex of the cornea with the eye in the primary position and the other passing through the lateral orbital margin. [1] Although various techniques ranging from instrumental to radiological had been used to measure this value in different studies, the use of instrument, Hertel's exophthalmometer, is mostly favored. [2],[3],[4],[5],[6]

Across various continents, the normal upper limit of exophthalmometric value had been documented to be 21 mm. [3],[4],[5] However, this is not a clear-cut value because of difference in anthropometric values with different races and geographic locations, and upper limit for one race may not be absolutely the same for the others. [1],[7],[8]

The acceptable difference in the exophthalmometric values between the right and left eyes (relative exophthalmometric value) varied among earlier author. [9],[10],[11] While some authors [11],[12] reported an acceptable upper value of 1 mm, others [9],[13],[14] suggested 2 mm. However, there is a general agreement that relative ocular protrusion is clinically significant when it exceeds 2 mm. [15] The clinical usefulness of exophthalmometry is in the management of proptosis which is an important clinical sign in the evaluation of orbital diseases. [10]

The normal morphologic and functional values of eyelids vary widely between race, sex, and age. [16] Therefore, the knowledge of the average facial and eyelid dimensions based on age, gender, and race is critical for eyelid surgeons to avert complications and achieve satisfactory outcomes. [17]

Gupta et al. reported a lower medial and lateral intercanthal distance among the Indian population compared with other races. [18] Price et al. opined that African American men have higher upper eyelid crease height when compared with that of their Caucasian counterparts. [19] In Nigeria, Oladipo et al. reported a higher canthal distance in Ijaws compared with Igbos and they posited that it is mandatory to have local data of facial parameters of every population. [20],[21]


  Materials and Methods Top


Materials used included standard literate Snellen's chart, illiterate Snellen's E-chart, trial lens box, trial frame, pen torch, stadiometer, weighing scale, retinoscope, Hertel's exophthalmometer, questionnaire, cotton wool, methylated spirit, methylated soap, and 6-m tape measure.

This was a multistage population-based descriptive cross-sectional study. The subjects fulfilled the following criteria: persons of 16 years and above who voluntarily consented to participate, no history of previous eye/orbital trauma, no previous periocular or ocular surgery, no orbital or eyelid diseases that could affect either of the measurements, such as orbital cellulitis, blepharitis and eyelid tumors, and ocular infections, no history of thyroid eye disease, absence of high ametropia (>-6 myopia or >+7 hypermetropia), no facial asymmetry/abnormalities, and absence of anophthalmos.

Informed consent was obtained from the participants, while ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethical Research Committee of the hospital. The study was also conducted in line with the guidelines and principles outlined by the Helsinki's declaration on human research.

The exophthalmometry was done as described by Sodhi et al. [22] The subjects sat down with their faces at the same level as the examiner's (primary position of gaze). The lateral bony margin of the orbits was digitally palpated after which the footplates of the instrument were positioned gently at these points without exerting excessive pressure. Left footplate, which was fixed, was positioned on the right lateral orbital rim, and the other footplate was adjusted until both footplates rested on orbital rims symmetrically. The rest of the instrument was held parallel to the frontal plane of the patient in line with the pupils. It was also held horizontally with the parallax correcting device (red line) aligned with the gap on millimeter rule. The right eye of the investigator was used to read the subject's left exophthalmometry values (EV), while the left eye was used for the subject's right eye. The EV was taken to the nearest 1 mm of the measuring scale of Hertel's exophthalmometer coinciding with the apex of the cornea. Measurements were taken thrice using the same Hertel's base and the mean of the three readings were taken as the final value.

Palpebral fissure dimensions

The measurement of dimensions was done using the guidelines described by Oztürk et al. [23] The palpebral fissure dimensions were measured in primary position of gaze except upper eyelid crease which was done at down gaze [Appendices 1 and 2]. The subjects were seated comfortably in a chair opposite to and at eye level with the investigator. The subject was asked to look at the first letter on Snellen's chart at a distance of 6 m. The zero mark on the plastic ruler was aligned with the first reference point, while the measurement was read off from the interception of the second reference point with the meter rule. The two eyes were assessed sequentially, with the right eye done first.



The palpebral fissure dimensions measured are as follows: Palpebral fissure height was defined as the central vertical distance between the upper and lower lid margin, while palpebral fissure width was measured as the horizontal distance between the medial and lateral canthi. Medial canthal distance was taken as the horizontal distance between medial canthus and medial limbus, while lateral canthal distance was measured as the horizontal distance between lateral canthus and lateral limbus. The inter-inner canthal and inter-outer canthal distances were taken as the horizontal distance between right and left medial canthi and right and left lateral canthi, respectively. The margin reflex distance was taken as the vertical distance between the upper eyelid margin and cornea reflex.


  Results Top


A total of 1020 participants were studied with an age range of 16-85 years (mean ± SD = 46 ± 14.4 years). The distribution of the EV of the right and left eyes is shown in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2], respectively. Fifteen millimeters is the most frequently occurring EV, while EV ranged from 10 to 22 mm in both eyes.
Figure 1: Distribution of the exophthalmometric values for the right eye

Click here to view
Figure 2: Distribution of exophthalmometric values for the left eye

Click here to view


The mean EV for the right and left eyes are shown in [Table 1]. The mean values for the right and left eyes were 15.27 ± 2.5 mm and 15.31 ± 2.4 mm, respectively. There was no significant difference between the mean EV of the two eyes (t = 1.753, P = 0.08). The range of differences in exophthalmometric value between the left and right eyes was 0-2 mm.
Table 1: Relative exophthalmometric values between the two eyes

Click here to view


The results of the palpebral dimensions were as shown in [Table 2]. The mean ± SD of right palpebral fissure height was 8.3± 1.6 while the left was 8.3 ± 1.7.
Table 2: Summary statistics of palpebral dimensions

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In this study, the range of EV obtained was lower than the reported values in African Americans, [4],[24] Chinese, [25] and Caucasians, [4] but higher than the obtained value in Sri Lankans, [26] Taiwaneese, [8] Turkish, [27] and Dutch. [16] It was, however, similar to the previously reported values among Nigerians by Majekodunmi and Oluwole. [28] These differences can be attributed to the differences in the bony orbital structure and the uniqueness of skeletal build-up of mankind over different regions of the earth. [22] The variation in genetic composition of human beings across different races could also be responsible for this.

Opinions vary on the effect of laterality on EV. While some authors [28],[29] reported a higher value in the left eye, Kashkouli et al. [30] reported a higher value in the right eye while Migliori et al. [4] could not demonstrate any significant difference between the two eyes. In this study, the mean EV was higher in the left eye although it was not statistically significant (P = 0.080). This is in agreement with the findings of Majekodunmi and Oluwole [28] who attributed the higher EV in the left eye to the farther forward position of the right lateral rims. However, Kashkouli et al. [30] did not find any obvious reason to account for the difference in the EV between the two eyes and they attributed the difference to technical error (parallax). [31] In the studied population, the higher EV in the left eye could be due to subtle facial asymmetry that was probably missed due to non-availability of radiological instrument (orbital X-ray or computed tomography) which would have been more reliable to detect subtle facial asymmetry. Furthermore, this finding could actually indicate that laterality truly exists and had an effect on exophthalmometric value in the studied population.

The maximum relative exophthalmometric value obtained in this study was 2 mm in all age groups, which is similar to the documented values by some previous authors, [4],[30] but contrary to the findings of Majekodunmi and Oluwole [28] who reported a maximum difference of 3 mm among Nigerian populace. This difference could be due to the different sample sizes and study design used in the two studies (population based vs. hospital based).

The medial and lateral intercanthal distances among the studied population were higher than those obtained in Turkey by Cem et al. [32] and in Nigeria among Ijaw tribe by Oladipo and co-workers. [20] They are, however, comparable to the values previously obtained among Yoruba by Anas. [33] This variation is not unusual as ethnic variations do exist in human anthropometry. [33] The differences in the values among the studied population compared with other races further reinforce the effect of race and tribe on palpebral dimensions.

 
  References Top

1.
Lam AK, Lam CF, Leung WK, Hung PK. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation of Hertel exophthalmometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2009;29:472-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Asman P. Ophthalmological evaluation in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003;81:437-48.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Boulos PR, Hardy I. Thyroid-associated orbitopathy: A clinicopathologic and therapeutic review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:389-400.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Migliori ME, Gladstone GJ. Determination of the normal range of exophthalmometric values for black and white adults. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:438-42.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Terwee CB, Prummel MF, Gerding MN, Kahaly GJ, Dekker FW, Wiersinga WM. Measuring disease activity to predict therapeutic outcome in Graves' ophthalmopathy. Clin Endocrinol 2005;62:145-55.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Kaye SB, Green JR, Lowe KJ. Dependence of ocular protrusion, asymmetry of protrusion and lateral interorbital width on age. Acta Ophthalmol 1992;70:762-5.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Wiersinga WM, Prummel MF. Graves' ophthalmopathy: A rational approach to treatment. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2002;13:280-7.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Tsai CC, Kau HC, Kao SC, Hsu WM. Exophthalmos of patients with Graves' disease in Chinese of Taiwan. Eye 2006;20:569-73.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Comer GW. Exophthalmometry. In: Eskridge JB, editor. Textbook of clinical Procedures in Optometry. 1 st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Co; 1991. p. 350-7.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Osuobeni EP, al-Harbi AA. Normal values of ocular protrusion in Saudi Arabian male children. Optom Vis Sci 1995;72:557-64.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Sleep TJ, Manners RM. Interinstrument variability in Hertel-type exophthalmometers. Ophthal. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;18:254-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Kashkouli MB, Beigi B, Noorani MM, Nojoomi M. Hertel exophthalmometry: Reliability and interobserver variation. Orbit 2003;22:239-45.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Carlson NB, Kurtz D. Exophthalmometry. In: Kurtz D, editor. Clinical Procedures for Ocular Examination. 3 rd ed. NY: McGraw-Hill Co.; 2004. p. 317-20.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Segni M, Bartley GB, Garrity JA, Bergstralh EJ, Gorman CA. Comparability of proptosis measurements by different techniques. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:813-8.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Chang AA, Bank A, Francis IC, Kappagoda MB. Clinical exophthalmometry: A comparative study of the Luedde and Hertel exophthalmometers. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1995;23:315-8.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Mourits MP, Lombardo SH, Van der Sluijs FA, Fenton S. Reliability of exophthalmos measurement and the exophthalmometry value distribution in a healthy Dutch population and in Graves' patients. An exploratory study. Orbit 2004;23:161-8.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Nkenke E, Maier T, Benz M, Wiltfang J, Holbach LM, Kramer M, et al. Hertel exophthalmometry versus computed tomography and optical 3D imaging for the determination of the globe position in zygomatic fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;33:125-33.   Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Gupta VP, Sodhi PK, Pandey RM. Normal values for inner intercanthal, interpupillary, and outer intercanthal distances in the Indian population. Int J Clin Pract 2003;57:25-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Price KM, Gupta PK, Woodward JA, Stinnett SS, Murchison AP. Eyebrow and eyelid dimensions: An anthropometric analysis of African Americans and Caucasians. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124:615-23.   Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Oladipo GS, Okoh PD, Hart JS. Anthropometric study of ocular dimensions in adult Ijaws of Nigeria. Res J Med Med Sci 2010;5:121-4.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Oladipo GS, Fawehinmi HB, Okoh PD. Canthal indices of Urhobo and Itsekiri ethnic grups Austral. J Basic Appl Sci 2009;3:3093-6.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Sodhi KP, Gupta VP, Pandey RM. Exophthalmometric values in a normal Indian population. Orbit 2001;20:1-9.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Oztürk F, Yavas G, Inan UU. Normal Periocular Anthropometric Measurements in the Turkish Population. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006;13:145-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Barretto RL, Mathog RH. Orbital measurement in black and white populations. Laryngoscope 1999;109:1051-4.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Quant JR, Woo GC. Normal values of eye position and head size in Chinese children from Hong Kong. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:668-71.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
WengOnn C, Madge S, Senaratne N, Senanayake T, Edussuriya S, Selva K, et al. Exophthalmometric values and their biometric correlates: The Kandy Eye Study. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009;37:496-502.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Swan LK, Stephan CN. Estimating eyeball protrusion from body height, interpupillary distance, and inter-orbital distance in adults. J Forensic Sci 2005;50:774:6.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Majekodunmi S, Oluwole M. Normal exophthalmometry value for Nigerian. West Afr J Med 1989;8:35-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
[PUBMED]    
29.
Frueh WT, Frueh BR. Errors of single-mirror or prism Hertel exophthalmometers and recommendations for minimizing the errors. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;23:197-201.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Kashkouli MB, Nojomi M, Parvaresh MM, Sanjari MS, Modarres M, Noorani MM. Normal Values of Hertel Exophthalmometry in Children, Teenagers, and Adult from Tehran, Iran. Optom Vis Sci 2008;85:1012-7.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Kim IT, Choi JB. Normal range of exophthalmos values on orbit computerized tomography in Koreans. Ophthalmologica 2001;215:156-62.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Evereklioglu C, Yakinci C, Er H, Doganay S, Durmaz Y. Normative values of craniofacial measurements in idiopathic benign microcephalic children. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:260-3.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Anas I. Facial Anthropometry of the Hausa and Yoruba Ethnic Groups. M. Sc Dissertation Submitted to Department of Anatomy, Usman Dan Fodio University, Sokoto, 2008. p. 10-50.  Back to cited text no. 33
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
   Abstract
  Introduction
   Materials and Me...
  Results
  Discussion
   References
   Article Figures
   Article Tables
 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2706    
    Printed72    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded146    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

[TAG2] [TAG3] [TAG4]